On 21 June 1982, the Queensland Art Gallery’s new permanent home at South Bank was officially opened, as part of the celebrations, a new acquisition was officially unveiled — Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) c.1629-30 (illustrated) by Peter Paul Rubens (28 June 1577–1640), made possible through a gift by the Gallery’s Foundation. Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) is one of the Gallery’s most important old master works by one of the greatest painters of the seventeenth century.

As a celebrated painter of the Baroque, Rubens established new terms and techniques for the rendering of flesh and light. Besides being a prolific artist whose studio undertook commissions from the courts of France, Spain and England, Rubens was also a businessman, scholar, collector, courtier. His education included classical and humanist training and he knew many languages, becoming a major figure in the diplomatic world.

Italian Renaissance painter, Titian (Tiziano Vecellio, 1488–1576) inspired Rubens to paint — Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) — a tribute of love and tenderness that he kept until his death and stated in his will that it not be put up for sale. He left it to his wife Helena, too intimate a work to be sold to another. But, of course, it was. This is its story.

Peter Paul Rubens ‘Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian)’ c.1629-30

Peter Paul Rubens, Flanders 1577-1640 / Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) c.1629-30 / Oil on canvas / 91.8 x 68.3cm / Purchased 1980. QAG Foundation / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art

Peter Paul Rubens, Flanders 1577-1640 / Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) c.1629-30 / Oil on canvas / 91.8 x 68.3cm / Purchased 1980. QAG Foundation / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / View full image

For northern painters of the sixteenth century, the work of the Italians was a necessary course of study. One traveled to see and study and copy these objects at close quarters. Rubens’s copies were more than slavish imitation however, his talent and mastery of his medium was accomplished and confident when he experienced their work in Italy, Spain and England. Young woman in a fur wrap was closely inspired by Titian’s Girl in a fur (wrap) c.1535–37 (illustrated) (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna), completed a century earlier. Titian died in August 1576. Rubens was born in June 1577.

Rubens, like Titian was a court painter to kings, dukes and princes in Italy, Spain and England, he studied and copied the work of many Italian painters, though it was Titian that Rubens appeared to have held a particular fascination and admiration. Copying by doing rather than simply looking was the preferred course for professional painters as it afforded insight into composition, pigments, brush technique, tonal orchestration and colour glazing. While engraved copies of master works circulated at the time, they were entirely inadequate with regard to the colour and texture of pearly flesh or the minute, expressive inflections of a gaze. At the time of Rubens’s death in May 1640 there were 33 copies of Titian’s works in addition to eight paintings and two sketches by the Venetian master in the inventory of Rubens’s estate.

Comparison of Peter Paul Rubens (left) and Titian (right)

(Left) Peter Paul Rubens, Flanders 1577–1640 / Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) (detail) c.1629-30 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / (Right) Titian (Tiziano Vecelli), Italy 1488–1576 / Girl in a Fur (wrap) 1535 / Oil on canvas / 95.5 x 63.7cm / Collection: Kunsthistoriches Museum, Vienna

(Left) Peter Paul Rubens, Flanders 1577–1640 / Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) (detail) c.1629-30 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / (Right) Titian (Tiziano Vecelli), Italy 1488–1576 / Girl in a Fur (wrap) 1535 / Oil on canvas / 95.5 x 63.7cm / Collection: Kunsthistoriches Museum, Vienna / View full image

Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) by Rubens anticipates the tenderness and sensuality of his late works, he is unable to resist endowing the Titianesque beauty with that slightly quizzical inviting glance that so often identifies his women, his own distinctive style of fleshy abundance, he has changed the face, and in particular the eyes and there are significant differences when the two paintings are closely compared even though the same pose and garments are worn by the earlier sitter.

‘Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian)’

Peter Paul Rubens, Flanders 1577–1640 / Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) (detail) c.1629-30 / Oil on canvas / 91.8 x 68.3cm / Purchased 1980. QAG Foundation / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art

Peter Paul Rubens, Flanders 1577–1640 / Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) (detail) c.1629-30 / Oil on canvas / 91.8 x 68.3cm / Purchased 1980. QAG Foundation / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / View full image

The depiction of the young woman in QAGOMAs painting — Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) — is believed to be Rubens’s second wife Helena Fourment (1614–74, married in 1630). Rubens executed at least one other work after the Titian original of his wife some seven years later, Helena Fourment in a fur wrap known as Het pelskin 1636–38 (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna). Reminiscent of the ‘Venus pudica’ of antiquity (a term used to describe an unclothed classic figural pose either standing or reclining), the ‘modest Venus’ covers her nakedness with both arms.

(Left) ‘Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian)’ (Right) ‘Helena Fourment in a fur wrap’

(Left) Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) (detail) c.1629-30 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / (Right) Helena Fourment in a fur wrap 1636–38 / Collection: Kunsthistorisches Museum

(Left) Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) (detail) c.1629-30 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / (Right) Helena Fourment in a fur wrap 1636–38 / Collection: Kunsthistorisches Museum / View full image

Curatorial extracts, research and supplementary material compiled by Elliott Murray, Senior Digital Marketing Officer, QAGOMA

Peter Paul Rubens Young woman in a fur wrap (after Titian) is on display within the Queensland Art Gallery’s International Art Collection, Philip Bacon Galleries (7-9).

Related Stories

  • Read

    Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec: An astute observer of life

    Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (24 November 1864-1901) moved to Montmartre, Paris in 1882 and was instantly drawn to the city’s demi-monde — famous for its cabarets where people would go to enjoy music, dance, and shows; the cafes and circuses; the racetrack; a place for escape, pleasure, entertainment, and sexual freedom. Montmartre became a part of Paris in 1860, it was an area populated by artists who mostly could not afford the rents of Quartier Latin, but also attracted writers, poets, and performers. Toulouse-Lautrec found his subjects in the fleeting crowds and urban spectacle with the opening of the Moulin Rouge in 1889. Montmartre c.1890 Already passionately fond of drawing, Toulouse-Lautrec was an astute observer of life and a talented drafter. His career coincided with the emergence of modern printmaking and poster production, as well as the emergence of Parisian nightlife and entertainment when the young provincial aristocrat launched himself into the bohemian world of Montmartre. Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec ‘Tete de fille (Head of a girl)’ 1892 In a brief and brilliant career of just over a decade, he produced some of the best-known images of Paris and its nightlife in the form of lithographic posters and prints, inspired by the formal elements of traditional Japanese print-making: flat colour surfaces; asymmetrical, cropped compositions; and pronounced outlines. Working en plein air in the manner of the Impressionists, the artist was drawn to the people on the fringes of so-called respectable society. Toulouse-Lautrec rejected the conventional cliché of fallen women, he frequented the brothels and clubs, befriended the women who worked there, and produced a sensitive and profoundly human portrait of their world in a series of lithographs known as ‘Elles’. This oval portrait Tete de fille (Head of a girl) 1892 (illustrated) is one of fifteen the artist made of women who worked at a brothel on the Rue Amboise. Prostitution was a way of life in the ninetheenth century and like Toulouse-Lautrec, the theme was utilised by a number of artists including Edgar Degas (19 July 1834–1917). Toulouse-Lautrec regularly took up residence in brothels, he commented: ‘Brothel. Well, what of it? Nowhere else do I feel more at home…’.
  • Read

    The visible & invisible evidence in Tintoretto’s ‘The risen Christ’

    The collaborative research of curator and conservator can deeply enhance our understanding and evaluation of works of art. The curator seeks to define a works’ art historical and other contexts, provide a reading of its iconography and a description of its stylistic character, while the conservator focuses on the material analysis of the work, interpreting both the seen and unseen evidence of its physical development. Cristo risorgente (The risen Christ) (illustrated) by Jacopo Tintoretto (1518-94) depicts Christ rising from his tomb, triumphant over death and illuminated by a rising sun. The staff in Christ’s left hand holds up a banner celebrating the resurrection, while his right hand delivers a gesture of blessing or benediction to the awakening soldier. In its original church setting — likely as an altarpiece placed above the faithful — the foreshortened figure of Christ would have delivered an even more dramatic sense of the miracle of life defeating death. Tintoretto is one of the masters of the Venetian Renaissance, although he painted portraits of eminent Venetians, he was best known for his religious works, many of which were commissioned by churches. Tintoretto ‘Cristo risorgente’ c.1555 Tintoretto is a prominent figure within the history of sixteenth-century art. Principally self-taught, he is said to have spent a short time under Titian (1488–1576) and, later, Schiavone (1510/15–1563). One of the earliest critical commentaries on Tintoretto occurs in a letter from Pietro Aretino (1492-1556). Aretino admonished Tintoretto for his fa presto (his speed of execution) and his lack of ‘finish’. The biographer, Ridolfi (1594–1658), who published a life of Tintoretto in 1642, described the artist’s working method in considerable detail, noting that he kept a motto fixed to his easel: II disegno di Michaelangelo ed il colorito di Tiziano (The design of Michaelangelo and the colour of Titian), one to which he evidently held fast as he worked on Cristo risorgente (The risen Christ). We know from Ridolfi that Tintoretto: ‘trained himself also by concocting in wax and clay small figures which he dressed in scraps of cloth, attentively studying the folds of the cloth on the outlines of the limbs. He also placed some of the figures in little houses, and in perspective scenes made of wood and cardboard, and, by means of little lamps, he contrived for the windows he introduced therein lights and shadows.’ Tintoretto chose to work in a studio that admitted little natural light studying, drawing and painting from these small and dramatically illuminated modellos. Ridolfi continues: ‘He also hung some models by threads to the roof beams to study the appearance they made when seen from below, and, to get the foreshortening of figures for ceilings, creating by such methods bizarre effects, or capricci (capricious effects). Through such means Tintoretto was able to build the dramatic narrative and theatrical force of his paintings. The original size of the composition can be reconstructed by closely examining an X-radiograph of the painting (illustrated). The structure of the current wooden stretcher can be seen in the X-radiograph, which probably dates from when the painting was last lined during the nineteenth century. Two sets of handmade tacks suggests that the painting has been lined twice on this stretcher. A row of 1cm diameter holes, spaced about every 10-12cm down the left edge of the painting, relate to the original method of stretching, probably by means of lacing. X-radiograph of ‘Cristo risorgente’ An impression of the original stretcher can also be seen from the X- radiograph, showing a structure with corner braces. Extrapolating from these impressions assists conjecture on the original size of the painting. It seems apparent that the work has been trimmed, losing approximately 2cm from the left and bottom edges (about the amount one might expect to lose in the course of a glue lining), approximately 4 to 5cm from the top edge and as much as 8 to 9cm from the right. The painting’s original dimensions would, therefore, have been approximately 206cm high x 148cm wide. Ridolfi also delineates the role of drawing in Tintoretto’s work: ‘He set himself to draw the living model in all sorts of attitudes which he endowed with the grace of movement, drawing from them an endless variety of foreshortenings. Sometimes he dissected corpses in order to study the arrangement of the muscles, so as to combine his observation of sculpture with his study of nature. Taking from the first its formal beauty and from the second unity and delicacy.’ X-radiography, infrared examination and cross-sectional analysis have revealed that Cristo risorgente underwent numerous changes in its compositional structure. Drawing played an important role throughout, from charcoal drawing on white gesso, lead white on brown imprimatura, to lines drawn in the final surface. Pigments bound in (presumably) linseed oil were also used inventively. For example, very large clusters of lead white were bound in the azurite and ultramarine blues of the sky. These would catch the flickering candlelight in the painting’s chapel setting, to create a shimmering, silvery dawn sky. Pigments used in The Resurrection were consistent with the sixteenth-century palette and included lead white, azurite, ultramarine, (probably) ultramarine ash, copper resinate-type green glazes, green earth, various red lake pigments such as cochineal, red lead, red and yellow ochres, charcoal black and bone black. From the six cross- sections analysed, no lead-tin yellow was found. Evidence of the initial idea for the composition can be seen in infrared where the charcoal drawing on gesso suggests an initial tomb position in the mid-ground, perhaps similar to a version of this theme by Domenico Tintoretto (Gallerie dell’Accademia, Venice). This original tomb position was actually painted in brown before having the background landscape painted over it, and this shows through in many areas. The brown used in this area is comprised of palette scrapings. It is suggested that this general brown underpaint is the imprimatura on some of Tintoretto’s later works, produced by scraping off the...