Of all the works by (Frances) Vida Lahey (1882-1968), she is best known for her depiction of the weekly wash-day, Monday morning 1912 (illustrated). Known as a painter of oils on a wide range of subjects, she was also recognised throughout her career as a watercolourist of distinction for floral still lifes, therefore we have selected a suite of beautiful watercolours to profile.

Lahey was among a new breed of artist — the trained professional — who superseded the Victorian tradition of the genteel lady amateur. One of Australia’s best known woman artists, Lahey was born at Pimpama, a northern suburb of the Gold Coast, and although she studied and travelled widely to London and Europe, she always returned to Brisbane where she lived and painted for most of her life.

Vida Lahey in her studio

Vida Lahey in her studio, Telegraph, 25 August 1941 / Daphne Mayo Collection / UQFL119 / Courtesy: The University of Queensland / Reproduced courtesy of Queensland Newspapers, Brisbane

Vida Lahey in her studio, Telegraph, 25 August 1941 / Daphne Mayo Collection / UQFL119 / Courtesy: The University of Queensland / Reproduced courtesy of Queensland Newspapers, Brisbane / View full image

Women Prominent in Brisbane’s Art World, 1934

Vida Lahey profiled in ‘Women who are Prominent in Brisbane’s Art World’, published in ‘The Telegraph’ 8 June 1934 also included Daphne Mayo, Enid Dickson, Caroline Barker, Gwendolyn Grant, Jeanette Sheldon, Mrs Charles Arthur Powell (Gladys Henrietta Dudley née Hobday), and Mrs. D. F. Cowell-Ham / 114526 / Courtesy: State Library of Queensland, Brisbane

Vida Lahey profiled in ‘Women who are Prominent in Brisbane’s Art World’, published in ‘The Telegraph’ 8 June 1934 also included Daphne Mayo, Enid Dickson, Caroline Barker, Gwendolyn Grant, Jeanette Sheldon, Mrs Charles Arthur Powell (Gladys Henrietta Dudley née Hobday), and Mrs. D. F. Cowell-Ham / 114526 / Courtesy: State Library of Queensland, Brisbane / View full image

Exhibition opening, Brisbane 1934

(Left to right) Archbishop James Duhig, Daphne Mayo and Vida Lahey at the opening of Lahey’s exhibition, Griffiths Tea Rooms, Queen Street, Brisbane, 16 October 1934 / Daphne Mayo Collection, UQFL119 / Courtesy: The University of Queensland

(Left to right) Archbishop James Duhig, Daphne Mayo and Vida Lahey at the opening of Lahey’s exhibition, Griffiths Tea Rooms, Queen Street, Brisbane, 16 October 1934 / Daphne Mayo Collection, UQFL119 / Courtesy: The University of Queensland / View full image

The art environment in Brisbane was particularly conservative, making Lahey’s vibrant flower studies highly visible expressions of modernist ideas at the Royal Queensland Art Society’s annual exhibitions. Although floral still lifes were a popular genre throughout Australia, Lahey’s handling of brilliant colour was considered exceptional.

Various groupings can be made of Lahey’s flower studies — one by the artist herself — is using the same vase over a period for different studies, here we look at two such groupings from the Gallery’s Collection.

The cretonne curtain

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / The cretonne curtain 1933 / Watercolour and gouache over pencil
on wove paper on cardboard / 49.8 x 40cm / Gift of Ann Gruen in memory of her mother, Margaret Darvall 1970 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / The cretonne curtain 1933 / Watercolour and gouache over pencil
on wove paper on cardboard / 49.8 x 40cm / Gift of Ann Gruen in memory of her mother, Margaret Darvall 1970 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA / View full image

Flower study (White daisies, phlox and petrea)

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Flower study (White daisies, phlox and petrea) 1965 / Watercolour over pencil on wove paper / 33 x 30cm / Gift of the artist’s sister, Mrs M.E.A. Denholm 1969 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Flower study (White daisies, phlox and petrea) 1965 / Watercolour over pencil on wove paper / 33 x 30cm / Gift of the artist’s sister, Mrs M.E.A. Denholm 1969 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA / View full image

This same jug — imported from Germany by notable Brisbane businessman Carl Zoeller — can be seen in The cretonne curtain 1933, and again much later in Flower study (White daisies, phlox and petrea) 1965, and indeed appears in many of Lahey’s works. Of interest, the flowers in Flower study, the blue flowering climber Petrea (also known as ‘Purple Wreath’) was a favourite of Lahey’s mother, the blossoms retaining their colour for many weeks before slowly fading.

Art and nature

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Art and nature 1934 / Watercolour over pencil on cardboard / 52.5 x 60.6cm / Gift of the Queensland Art Fund 1950 in memory of Miss Madge Roe (1891-1938) / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Art and nature 1934 / Watercolour over pencil on cardboard / 52.5 x 60.6cm / Gift of the Queensland Art Fund 1950 in memory of Miss Madge Roe (1891-1938) / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA / View full image

Crocus and sunflowers

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Crocus and sunflowers 1955 / Watercolour over pencil on thin cream wove paper / 50.4 x 40.2cm / Bequest of George Brown 1977 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Crocus and sunflowers 1955 / Watercolour over pencil on thin cream wove paper / 50.4 x 40.2cm / Bequest of George Brown 1977 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA / View full image

Art and nature 1934, an exploration of the ‘white on white’ technique, is one of Lahey’s most complex still life paintings, commenting on the clash in painting of traditionalism and modernism, represented by a classical plaster bas relief by her friend and Brisbane contemporary Daphne Mayo, a book on Matisse, and the brilliantly coloured Mexican sunflower which yield dozens of daisy-like blooms. The same jug is used in Crocus and sunflowers 1955, with the shapes of strap-like leaves and jug forming an ellipse against a simple background of wall and window.

Lahey and Mayo had a long association with the Queensland (National) Art Gallery, Lahey was a member of its Board of Advice from 1923 until 1930, in 1929 Lahey and Mayo founded the Queensland Art Fund, which purchased works, in 1932 Mayo was instrumental in obtaining for the Gallery its first major endowment, through the Godfrey Rivers Trust, enabling the Gallery to acquire contemporary Australian art, Lahey was a member of the acquisition committee until 1937, also a Trustee of the Godfrey Rivers Trust, and founder in 1941 of the Gallery’s child art scholarship class.

Daphne Mayo (left) seated in a room that contains photographs and replicas of the artist’s previous works c.1930s / Daphne Mayo Collection, UQFL119 / Courtesy: The University of Queensland

Daphne Mayo (left) seated in a room that contains photographs and replicas of the artist’s previous works c.1930s / Daphne Mayo Collection, UQFL119 / Courtesy: The University of Queensland / View full image

Delve into the Collection

Monday morning 1912, which shows two women doing the weekly wash with copper, tubs and bar soap, was once a common sight in Australian households. With the advent of mechanical aids and electricity this sight has now vanished, recording as it does a bygone era in vivid detail. In depicting the weekly washday at Lahey’s home in Indooroopilly, Brisbane, Monday morning records the life of most Queensland women in the early Twentieth Century. Esme, a younger sister, was the model for the woman at the washtub.

Monday morning 1912

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Monday morning 1912 / Oil on canvas / 153 x 122.7cm / Gift of Madame Emily Coungeau through the Queensland Art Society 1912 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Monday morning 1912 / Oil on canvas / 153 x 122.7cm / Gift of Madame Emily Coungeau through the Queensland Art Society 1912 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA / View full image

Australian floral subjects have been popular since the 1890s, and after Australia attained nationhood through the federation of its six states in 1901, sentiments of national pride, and patriotism soon developed with the Wattle a favourite floral subject and emblem of Australia. In Lahey’s lifetime, the Wattle Day League founded in Sydney in 1909, and a Queensland branch established in 1912, it is possible that Lahey painted Wattle in a yellow vase c.1912-15 for a promotional Wattle Day event at the time.

Geraldton wax in vase c.1950s is of particular interest as a native Australian flower study as the Gallery currently holds only one other Australian floral subject by Lahey, Wattle in a yellow vase c.1912-15 (illustrated) which is one of Lahey’s earliest flower studies. Green vase with gerberas 1948 exhibits the intense vibrant colours she experimented with during the 1930s and 1940s. The works after the 1940s are more subdued however the play of pattern can be just as vibrant and experimental as seen in her use of distinctive table cloths and vases in her still life paintings.

Edited extract by Glenn R Cooke, former Curator (Queensland Heritage), QAGOMA. Additional research and supplementary material by Elliott Murray, Senior Digital Marketing Officer, QAGOMA

Wattle in a yellow vase 1912-15

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Wattle in a yellow vase c.1912-15 / Oil on canvas on plywood / 24 x 29cm / Gift of the Estate of Shirley Lahey through the Queensland Art Gallery Foundation 2012 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Wattle in a yellow vase c.1912-15 / Oil on canvas on plywood / 24 x 29cm / Gift of the Estate of Shirley Lahey through the Queensland Art Gallery Foundation 2012 / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA / View full image

Geraldton wax in vase 1950s

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Geraldton wax in vase c.1950s / Watercolour on paper / 34.5 x 44.5cm / Gift of Rosemary Goodchild through the Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art Foundation 2015. Donated through the Australian Government’s Cultural Gifts Program / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Geraldton wax in vase c.1950s / Watercolour on paper / 34.5 x 44.5cm / Gift of Rosemary Goodchild through the Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art Foundation 2015. Donated through the Australian Government’s Cultural Gifts Program / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA / View full image

Green vase with gerberas 1948

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Green vase with gerberas 1948 / Watercolour on paper / 47.3 x 38.3cm / Gift of Rosemary Goodchild through the Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art Foundation 2015. Donated through the Australian Government’s Cultural Gifts Program/ Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA

Vida Lahey, Australia 1882-1968 / Green vase with gerberas 1948 / Watercolour on paper / 47.3 x 38.3cm / Gift of Rosemary Goodchild through the Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art Foundation 2015. Donated through the Australian Government’s Cultural Gifts Program/ Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © QAGOMA / View full image

Related Stories

  • Read

    Strike a pose: Exploring the self-portrait

    ‘Strike a pose’ presents artworks made in the first decades of the twentieth century where artists assume the posture of the Grand Manner or ‘swagger’ portrait, exemplified by George Lambert’s The artist and his wife. These paintings are juxtaposed against Yasumasa Morimura’s modern-day parody Doublonnage (Marcel) which riffs on art history and the photographs of Marcel Duchamp, disrupting constructs of gender and race. George W Lambert In 1900, George W Lambert travelled to Europe as the inaugural recipient of the coveted New South Wales Travelling Scholarship, accompanied by his new bride Amy. The pair met painter Hugh Ramsay during the sea voyage, and later befriended fellow expatriate painter Ambrose Patterson while Lambert and Ramsay were studying in Paris. In this tableau, the artist and his circle appear as allegorical figures from history and literature. Reading from left to right, we see Lambert, Patterson, Amy and Ramsay. The identity of fifth figure is uncertain, although possible subjects include Australian painter Arthur Streeton, writer Arthur Adams or English painter Cecil Rae. While the painting is dated 1903, it was likely commenced in 1901 as Amy gave birth to her first son, Maurice, in June of that year. George W Lambert George W Lambert painted this self-portrait, featuring his wife Amy, in the tradition of the ‘Grand Manner’ or ‘swagger’ portrait, which typified English portraiture from the 1630s to the 1930s. The style, which emphasised the subject’s stature through pose and dress, was influenced by the paintings of Flemish artist Anthony van Dyck (1599–1641), named court painter to England’s King Charles I in 1632, and later mastered by the English portraitist Thomas Gainsborough (1727–88) and American painter John Singer Sargent (1856–1925). Lambert in London established a reputation for portraits of public figures, including his patron, King Edward VII. In addition to these commissions, Lambert often made portraits of family and friends, such as Self portrait with Ambrose Patterson, Amy Lambert and Hugh Ramsay. Yasumasa Morimura In Doublonnage (Marcel), contemporary Japanese artist Yasumasa Morimura combines performance art with photography, posing himself in a highly orchestrated tableau. He assumes the guise of famous artist Marcel Duchamp’s feminine alter ego Rrose Sélavy, as captured by photographer Man Ray in his classic image from 1921. Referring to Marcel in the title, this large photograph plays with the notion of double meaning. Is the protagonist male or female? How many different disguises (or hats) can one effect? Morimura’s photograph disrupts the conventions of the self-portrait genre while assuming its effects.
  • Read

    The Gordon Bennett Studio: Samford Valley

    ‘Unfinished Business: The Art of Gordon Bennett’ presents the work of an artist deeply engaged with questions of identity, perception and the construction of history. Simon Wright, a long-time friend of the artist, recalls the man in the studio in our two part series, continuing with his purpose-built Samford Valley studio. Gordon Bennett’s Samford Valley studio, completed in 1994–95, was a 150-square-metre standalone ‘shed’ with covered verandahs. It included climate control, storage racks and other purpose-built features. It was Gordon’s ‘dream scenario’. Visiting the vacant block, I can recall how excited Leanne was as she moved around the house slab and peg markings for the home-to-be, describing rooms and garden layouts. Gordon seemed focused entirely on how big the studio would be, relative to the house, and how far a walk it would be from the pool. When the new working space was complete — apart from the benefit of its vast scale relative to what he had grown used to — Gordon was able to better document finished works, build and store his own collection and focus on a growing interest that would soon shift his studio practice again: how computers could upgrade and replace analogue aspects of his practice. In 1995, Gordon was awarded a place in the Australian Network for Art and Technology Summer School in Brisbane. It was here that he developed computer skills that would soon influence his practice: not only in ‘painting stills’ but also in animation, video and scanning. Around the time of his next studio residency, as the recipient of the anniversary Creative Arts Fellowship at the Australian National University’s Canberra School of Art in 1996, his entire modus operandi would change. Almost immediately, he moved from incessant pencil-jotting of thoughts in notepads to sourcing, lifting or sketching an image quickly. At odds with his peers, and many well-established or emerging artists at the time, Gordon had fully transitioned to adopt computer technology as a core studio tool, and never looked back. He quickly became highly adept at using Photoshop and other Adobe and Apple production and editing software in support of his aims. Gordon did not feel bound by technology; in fact, he enjoyed using it as a medium turned back on itself, especially given the strong conceptual linkages to his practice. After all, printing technologies and digital advances are themselves inextricably tied to the ubiquitous visual culture of racism and its trafficking, however intimate or global. Indeed, as Ian McLean has suggested, all of Bennett’s paintings made following his Canberra studio residency — from the 1996 ‘Home décor’ series onwards — were worked up from preliminary Photoshop files. Gordon enjoyed the immediacy and convenience of using technology and the time it saved him digging through notes, drawing or redrawing something. At the Samford Valley studio, Gordon was able to split the space in half, in order to work simultaneously on multiple works in a major series or exhibition. He would hang several works in a long line, playing them off against one another, making or lessening formal connections, going from canvas to canvas with one colour at a time to expedite continuity, or optimise time. While Gordon was always working ‘in his head’, or on a screen, his time spent physically in the studio was used very efficiently and strategically, and was scheduled mostly to accord with the date a truck would arrive to cart works off for a commercial show or exhibition loan. Intense bursts of painting would ensue, including series of all-nighters that could sometimes run for weeks. He simply did not have any interest in sitting around painting to pass the time or exercise a habit; nor was studio time about honing technique or perfecting anatomical or landscape likenesses. One of my fondest memories of Gordon in the studio relates to a ‘joker’ figure that appears in several series across decades, and a variant of that figure who appears as a jester, with a harlequin hat, or Basquiat-like crown. As with many of the solitary figures in his work, the jester hat refers to Gordon himself, bearing witness, or expressing a universal truth via a very personal, lived experience, as a form of autobiography. While in particular works, such as Home décor (Preston + De Stijl = Citizen) Men with weapons 1997, the joker hat device adds gravitas and solemnity, the hat itself was a prop in his studio. Only in that private studio space would Gordon don it, rarely, to clown around in, as a way to disrupt the weight of the task in front of him. In those moments Gordon would lose self-consciousness, put on a mock rap face or cheeky grin, and once only he allowed me to take a portrait of him. It’s my most precious memory of Gordon in his studio. Simon Wright is Assistant Director, Learning and Public Engagement, QAGOMA. This is an edited excerpt from his essay in the QAGOMA publication Unfinished Business: The Art of Gordon Bennett. Featured image: Gordon Bennett in his Samford Valley studio, painting Notes to Basquiat: Harlequin 2000 / Photograph: Simon Wright